1st Day 2023 Nevada Legislative Session

The Assembly chambers during the first day of the 82nd legislative session in Carson City on Feb. 6, 2023. (David Calvert/The Nevada Independent)

 

The 1st day of 2023 Nevada Legislative Session began on February 6, so this is just the beginning of her Bill “Watch List.” Read below for the Republican perspective on the bills that could become law in the future.

 

The following is from Yolanda Knaak, Legislative Chair, Nevada Federation of Republican Women.

LEGISLATIVE starter WATCH LIST:

AB103 Limiting the Nevada Governor’s emergency powers (SUPPORT)

AB88:  Requires proof of identity to vote in an election. (SUPPORT)

AB61. Extends time city has to canvas election ballots (OPPOSE)

SJR7 ELIMINATES THE ELECTION OF BOARD OF REGENTS (OPPOSE)

Nevada Policy’s Opinions on 2023 Bill Tracker

AB1: Sales & Tax Solid Waste Disposal Tax Proposal

Why We Oppose It: While this measure does require a vote of the people to pass, legislators need to stop using workarounds to the Gibbons Rule’s 2/3rd majority rule.

AB5: Local Government Unfunded Liabilities Studies

Why We Support It: The legislature constantly passes unfunded burdens to local governments without account for measures to pay for them, which inevitably leads to either local government debt or higher taxes. Conducting a study that collects all the information on unfunded mandates toward local governments will help drive transparency and serve as a roadmap to address overspending.

AB6: Expansion of Patient Protection Commission Powers and Duties

Why We Oppose It: Government interference into the healthcare market has gotten us to where we are today. This legislation and the Orwellian-named Patient Protection Commission will do little to help control the cost of healthcare and much to continue to prevent a cost-effective and efficient patient-centered market to form that provides quality healthcare with great access to all Nevadans.

SB9: Revises Provisions Relating to Education

Why We Oppose It: Nevada Policy is concerned that with the elimination of end-of-year finals, Nevada will lose an objective metric for accountability and teacher evaluation.

SB10: Revises Provisions Relating to State Infrastructure Bank

Why We Oppose It: Major transparency concerns in this bill should raise red flags for government watchdogs. Depriving taxpayers the right to know who is engaging with the State Infrastructure Bank is wrong and would lend itself to increasing the opportunity for corruption.

SB11: UAVs for Code Enforcement & Inspections

Why We Oppose It: The use of UAVs by local governments raises privacy concerns and potential 4th Amendment violations. The constitutionality of such legislation is in question.

SB24: Makes Office of Small Business Advocacy Permanent

Why We Support It: As one of the few positive government programs that exist, making the SBA permanent would be a positive policy move for small businesses and upstart entrepreneurs in Nevada.

SB28: Expands Film Tax Credits

Why We Oppose It: Film Tax Credits should be eliminated. They are generally net-losing policy across the country. Nevada has much greater needs for tax dollars than to subsidize film producers.

SB56: Commission on School Modernization

Why We Oppose It: Nevada Policy opposes the bill unless it is amended to include Governor appointments to the School Modernization Board.

SB65: School Board Certification Requirement

Why We Oppose It: SB65 places barriers on individuals who might want to pursue school board office in favor of incumbents. Currently, the requirements being sought in sections 2 & 3 to be imposed on citizens prior to being a candidate are mandatory for school board members when elected and they should remain as is. Imposing undue burdens to attain public office to protect incumbents is unbecoming of functioning democracies.

SB68: Tax Increase for Real Property Transfers

Why We Oppose It: Nevada does not need to raise taxes. We currently have a billion dollar surplus. Moreover, the housing crisis would be more effectively addressed by enabling more supply to enter the market vis-à-vis deregulation and zoning reform as to allow market supply to meet demand.

Total Page Visits: 343 - Today Page Visits: 2